Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Michael Pfeifer, Ph.D., P.E. Leave a Comment

Using Failure Analysis to Improve Product Reliability

Using Failure Analysis to Improve Product Reliability

Failures during product testing and use are a fact of life. Even with the most robust design we can develop an overly aggressive reliability test or find users that dish out punishing treatment, causing product failures. And for designs that are less robust, standard reliability tests and normal users will cause failures, occasionally or frequently depending on the design robustness.

When a product fails, its related to failure of individual components and/or joints between components. When a component or joint fails, it’s because their materials degraded to the point that the component or joint could no longer perform as required.

Root cause analysis and failure analysis

When a failure occurs, a root cause analysis should be performed to identify the event or decision that enabled the failure to occur and implement corrective actions to prevent the failure from reoccurring. Possible root causes are related to many areas such as design decisions, manufacturing problems, product testing conditions and problems, user error, improper maintenance, plain old wear out, and several others.

The first step of a root cause analysis is failure analysis of the product and the failed component or joint. Failure analysis is the engineering process used to determine the failure mode and mechanism of a component or joint and whether a materials deficiency contributed to the failure. It’s a powerful tool for making systematic and effective design and manufacturing decisions that lead to product reliability improvements.

The process includes gathering information about the product, failed components, and failure circumstances, and laboratory analysis of the failed component or joint.

Here’s what can be learned from a failure analysis:

  • How did the materials degrade?
  • What was the failure mode and mechanism?
  • Did the materials meet their composition, microstructure, and property requirements?
  • Was the component/joint properly fabricated?
  • Does the failure mode make sense for the test conditions?

The information is then used to identify the root cause of the failure. It’s unlikely a root cause will be accurately identified without the information gained from a failure analysis. And it’s likely that problems will linger.

Failure analysis process

Here’s a summary of the failure analysis process I use:

  1. Review the failure with the engineering team. This includes reviewing photos and drawings of the failed component or joint and discussing the failure circumstances.
  2. Identify the metallurgical analyses to perform and the samples to be evaluated. Selecting the appropriate metallurgical analyses and samples is important for getting helpful information. And it’s no fun paying for unnecessary analyses.
  3. Perform the metallurgical analyses and review the data. The analysis information and background information are used to identify the failure mode and mechanism and whether the materials had any metallurgical deficiencies.
  4. Meet with the engineering team to review the analysis findings and discuss possible root causes of the failure and next steps. While more information may be needed to identify the root cause, the failure analysis is crucial for helping point in the right direction. If a failure is related to the component’s design, the failure analysis findings are used to guide design changes.

Product reliability testing and failure analysis

Many people are familiar with using failure analysis to help determine the root cause of product failures during customer use. However, they are less familiar with using failure analysis during product development, when a product fails reliability tests. It’s unfortunate because many organizations are missing out on the benefits – reduced time to fix failures, fewer repeat failures, fewer repeated tests, and well-informed design decisions.

Instead, what often happens is people have a meeting to brainstorm potential root causes and go off to try to figure things out. Or, a design change will be made to the failed component or joint in hopes of making it more robust. Neither approach is systematic, and it may not fix the problem.

Improving product reliability

There can be many reasons for a failure, i.e. materials, mechanical design, supplier quality, manufacturing process, test conditions, … This information from a failure analysis helps engineering teams quickly identify the cause of the problem and enables well-informed decisions that result in improved product reliability.

  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.

Filed Under: Articles, Metals Engineering and Product Reliability, on Product Reliability

About Michael Pfeifer, Ph.D., P.E.

I’m a metallurgical engineer with over 25 years of experience working on product design, manufacturing, and root cause analysis.

Most engineers think of metallurgists only for failure analysis of component failures. While I do that, I also help design teams with component design. I help select alloys and coatings that have the corrosion, fatigue, wear, and creep properties needed to meet reliability requirements. Oftentimes, trade-offs are required between component form and materials to optimize a design for performance, reliability, and cost. I help do that, too.

« A New Paradigm for Reliability Engineering
3 Steps To Make RCAs More Impactful For Your Managers »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Michael PfeiferArticles by Michael Pfeifer, Ph.D., P.E.
in the Metals Engineering and Product Reliability article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy