Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Karl Burnett Leave a Comment

Water Works and Railroad Employee Manuals

Water Works and Railroad Employee Manuals

In 1873, the superintendent of the Montreal Water Works signed out a manual for his organization: 

“Rules and regulations for the employés [sic] in the department of the Montreal Water Works”

https://hdl.handle.net/2027/aeu.ark:/13960/t6252dh26

This was not a human resources manual and unlike today’s employee handbooks did not contain a dress code. It listed roles and responsibilities of the major departments and key positions, beginning with the duties of the chief engineer and the organization that ran the steam power plant. 

The manual contained several explicit safety rules. The safety rules emphasized safety of machinery. However, ensuring the safety of machinery could be termed prevention of damage…in other words, the organization was being proactive about preventive steps and essentially practicing preventive maintenance. The Water Commission formalized some of these preventive steps in their employee handbook. 

The first reference to safety is in the duties of the Chief Engineer, with overall responsibility for “all possible economy consistent with the safety and efficiency of the works.”

The engine-house operator was required to execute an emergency shutdown of the boiler and engine “in the event of anything occurring to the Machinery or Boilers by which their safety may be endangered.” A similar rule applied to the wheel-house operator. 

Workers were responsible at the end of the day, to report if an excavation worksite was safe, so that the nightwatchman could prepare lights. This was a fireable offense. 

Other elements of safety overlapped with boiler operation and maintenance rules. These rules about boilers came at a time when the cause of boiler explosions was still a matter of scientific inquiry. Safety regulations were still being publicly debated in Britain and the United States. However, France had national boiler inspection laws for half a century at this point.

The chief engineer was responsible for conducting set-point check of the boiler safety valves. He was also required to establish the safe operating pressure limit and post it with his signature. Boiler operators had a rule to check for feed water every half hour. Firemen were to pay particular attention to cleaning the boiler. 

This employee handbook also contained several formal requirements about lubrication. The operating engineers and their assistants were required to ensure that machinery was well-oiled. The oilers were required to follow the lubrications requirements set by the engineer, as well as keep the operating areas clean. 

Administrative reports included daily operations reports, weekly manpower reports, and monthly parts inventory use. Breakdowns of field equipment like hydrants and valves were required to be recorded in a log book. 

In 1912, a history of the Montreal water system was published and gives some context to the incorporation of steam power. It can be read here: https://www.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.86902/1?r=0&s=1

Superintendent Lesage was pictured in the 1912 history along with the mayor and other commissioners. The history related some of Lesage’s accomplishments in expanding water service. 

For the maintenance practitioner, annual reports to the commission contained more interesting details of the scope of repair services that Lesage’s water works provided. For instance, in his 1879 report listed 966 service repairs, 72 repairs to mains, and that 128 hydrants had frozen 835 times. (https://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433069076952?urlappend=%3Bseq=81%3Bownerid=13510798882150565-89)(bookhttps://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433069076952)

By 1885, Lesage reported to the commission that he was fielding a solution to frozen hydrants: 

“The old hydrants with brick chambers are giving a good deal of trouble in winter, from their liability to freeze. Several years ago the non freezing hydrants were introduced and are gradually taking the place of the old kind, being substituted for them as fast as these latter give way. Out of 936 fire hydrants in the city 177 are non-freezing, and I believe the sooner the change is completed the sooner will the cost of their maintenance be diminished. But this change will cost about $35,000 and cannot be done all at once without taxing too greatly the city revenue.”

(insert…picture of lease and snippet of repair report of 1879)

https://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.hndk4t

About the same time, the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway had a similar set of employee rules and regulations. This manual contained about a dozen requirements where the safety of the train was cited. The introduction directed the employee that they were responsible for extreme vigilance for the safety of all their tools, equipment, acts, and acts of of other employees and that they should take extra time to convince himself that all is safe. However, the opening also tells the potential victim that they assume all risk from employment there.

This railway rule book specified that steam pumps be lubricated with tallow, and that their oil cups should be able to run for 5 hours. Air pumps and brakes were different and required coach oil.   

Filed Under: Articles, History of Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Karl Burnett

As long as people have built things, they've been frustrated by failure. In some situations, organizations have tried to improve how they used resources to maintain the systems they built.

I am a practicing reliability engineer, Professional Engineer, and CMRP. Currently, I work in power plant services. Formerly, an engineering manager and maintenance manager in manufacturing, and nuclear submarine repair engineer. My first exposure to maintenance management was as a 19-year-old technician in the engine room of a guided missile cruiser.

« Test Reliability Targets and Expected Field Reliability
Lithium Battery Fires: Why Your Laptop Can Catch On Fire? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Karl BurnettArticles by Karl Burnett
in the History of Maintenance Management article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy