Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Dianna Deeney Leave a Comment

QDD 071 Supplier Control Plans and Design Specs

Supplier Control Plans and Design Specs

Supplier control plans and design specs can go hand-in-hand in the quest for quality.

Control plans aren’t just for quality professionals! Learn how partnering with suppliers for a simple control plan can benefit your design process.

 

View the Episode Transcript

Listen to the episode for what goes into a control plan and for examples where it benefited projects.

Control plans used with suppliers doesn’t have to be complicated. It can be shorter than 1 page in length.

It can be used for lots of purposes:

  • coordinates quality responsibilities between buyer and manufacturer
  • clarifies what’s needed on the design spec
  • helps everyone understand what’s important, how it’s measured, and what will happen if it’s wrong
  • build better contracts
  • gives a starting point when doing any root cause analysis
  • supplement controls listed in an FMEA

 

Citations:

Want to explore controls a little further? Try these other QDD episodes:

Prevention Controls vs. Detection Controls

How Many Controls do we Need to Reduce Risk?

Design Specs vs. Process Control, Capability, and SPC

 

Episode Transcript

We’re setting up requirements with vendors or suppliers. We need to communicate. What’s important about the component that we’re purchasing. We also need to have an agreement between us and our supplier about expectations. We can use a simple control plan to help us facilitate those conversations. And to also keep a record of who is doing what for future analysis, what is a control plan and how can it benefit our relationship with our suppliers? Let’s talk more about it after this brief introduction. Hello and welcome to Quality during Design, the place to use quality thinking to create products others love for less. My name is Dianna. I’m a senior level quality professional and engineer with over 20 years of experience in manufacturing and design. Listen in and then join the conversation at qualityduringdesign.com.

We’re working with suppliers or vendors to choose components. These are companies that are manufacturing components for us. We purchase them and then we assemble them as part of our new product design. Sometimes these suppliers are off the shelf and sometimes they are custom, no matter which as design engineers, we’re looking at the specifications of these parts and figuring out what the important features or characteristics are. We’re designing a lot of other parts and our interfaces with that component. So what has the supplier indicated their specification to be? And what’s their tolerances. When we’re choosing components and parts, we can look at our suppliers as partners in quality. If we can, we wanna be able to communicate with them and work with them on describing what’s important and how we’re going to measure it and ensure that opponent, our part is meeting the quality standards that we need for our product control plans are used to be able to communicate that type of information, a control plan captures what’s important for the quality of that component or part as it’s going into our bigger design.

And it also gets into how we’re going to monitor that part for quality control plans can be a simple one pager. And if we can work with our suppliers to create it, that’s even better. I’ve helped teams create control plans with suppliers, for components that were critical to the overall product design and function. And what happened was a better understanding of who is doing what and when, what features or characteristics are we examining at our incoming quality assurance? Does it match up with what they’re monitoring as important for their process control? Are they inspecting this feature during their in process manufacturing, providing a report and a certificate of conformance, and then is our incoming quality assurance looking at that certificate and maybe evaluating the results of their data. If they are evaluating that data, how are they evaluating it and what would be the trigger and the reaction plan, if something wasn’t quite right control plans used for components that are supplied, help us to do lots of things.

They used to help us coordinate with the supplier, with who’s doing what inspection and when it helps the supplier to understand what’s important, how it’s measured and what will happen if it’s wrong, it helps us build better contracts between us and our supplier, because it helps set direction and expectations for that particular part. There are other departments and people in our organization that are helping to define the relationship we have with our suppliers. The control plan is helping to set expectations for this particular part, but it could also change our relationship with the supplier on the broader level with our supplier managements groups, we may have to adjust our supplier agreements depending on what’s happening with our part. There was a case where we were using a supplier to produce and create parts for us that weren’t of a critical nature, but then a new product development came along and we wanted to work with the supplier to start creating parts that were critical to the product design.

That’s at a whole different level of expectations with the supplier agreement. And we were able to work that out and it’s even been the case where we said this characteristic of a part is really important and the supplier and came back and said, well, we don’t really have any control over that part of the component because that’s done by somebody else that we hire a third party supplier that led us to further describe the specification for quality control and also changed the way that we set up our supplier agreements. Having a control plan in hand also helps us with root cause analysis. We have a breadcrumb trail that we can follow as far as who’s doing what who’s looking at, what for their process control is this a third party supplier characteristic, a control plan gives us some of that insight into where things could have gone wrong.

And it can also be a supplement to an FMEA (failure mode and effects analysis). If we have a control plan for a part, we could reference that in the FMEA’s control column. And this also allows us to divorce our FMEA from the supplier’s eyes, if, if we didn’t want them to see the things in our FMEA the control plan has a more narrow scope that focuses on what’s important and how it’s measured. So what is a control plan that would be used with a supplier? What does it look like? It could be one page or less. It’s going to list characteristics. It can list things about the product itself, the critical features or the performance measurements that are important. It can list characteristics about the process that’s important. This is especially, so when it’s something chemical, an etching wash, a plating procedure, or even soldering standards for a circuit board for the characteristics, the control plan is also going to list the specification and its tolerance.

So that’s one thing that the supplier control plan is going to list is the characteristics as you’re designing and defining specifications, you may want to start out a control plan at the same time, because one can affect the other. You may find something in the control plan that you need to specify and make clear in the design specification. In our spec, we may have included features and their dimensions and tolerances, but we forgot about the important processing specs. After each characteristic, we list out the measurement or monitoring methods. We want to think about how it’s sampled for measurement. How many are sampled? How frequently are they sampled? How critical is this characteristic to our product design. If you’re already using FM E a to determine severity and then confidence levels for your B and V testing, then you can use that same information to determine the level of inspection for any characteristic of a part from manufacturing.

If you have a characteristic that has a high criticality, then you’re going to want to sample it more frequently and have a higher confidence in your sampling level that may drive how many that you want to look at and how frequently you look at it. If you don’t use FMEA in this way, then you still want to capture the, how many and how frequent for a measurement and monitoring method. We also want to capture who is measuring it. And when is it going to be the supplier as part as their outgoing inspection or in process inspection? Are we going to do it as part of our quality assurance incoming inspection, or is it an inspection during our manufacturing? If it’s a wrong fit, the part can’t go together. The last thing that the control plan could capture is a reaction plan for when things don’t go, right, what are we going to do? When things don’t measure properly, some of this would be captured in the supplier management agreement, but when we’re thinking of our suppliers as partners in quality, it helps to capture the reaction plan on the, the control plan itself. We just need to ensure that it aligns with our supplier agreement.

So what’s, today’s insight to action. When setting up suppliers, try working with them on a control plan for your product, you’ll find it may help you to make clear specifications and communicate expectations easier. You’ll find it’ll also help you to relate everything to risk, to help you determine what those critical features and performance characteristics should be. If you like the content in this episode, visit quality during design.com, where you can subscribe to the weekly newsletter to keep in touch. This has been a production of Deeney Enterprises. Thanks for listening!

 

Filed Under: Quality during Design

About Dianna Deeney

Dianna is a senior-level Quality Professional and an experienced engineer. She has worked over 20 years in product manufacturing and design and is active in learning about the latest techniques in business.

Dianna promotes strategic use of quality tools and techniques throughout the design process.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quality during Design podcast logo

Tips for using quality tools and methods to help you design products others love, for less.


by Dianna Deeney
Quality during Design,
Hosted on Buzzsprout.com
Subscribe and enjoy every episode
Google
Apple
Spotify

Recent Episodes

QDD 128 Leveraging Proven Frameworks or Concept Development

QDD 127 Understanding Cross-Functional Collaboration

QDD 126 Exploring the Problem Space: A Key Principle for Robust Product Design and Project Success

QDD 125 Exploring Product Development and AI Through Literature

QDD 124 Design for User Tasks using an Urgent/Important Matrix

QDD 123 Information Development in Design, with Scott Abel – Part 2 (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 122 Information Development in Design, with Scott Abel – Part 1 (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 121 Crafting Effective Technical Documents for the Engineering Field

QDD 120 How to use FMEA for Complaint Investigation

QDD 119 Results-Driven Decisions, Faster: Accelerated Stress Testing as a Reliability Life Test

QDD 118 Journey from Production to Consumption: Enhancing Product Reliability

QDD 117 QDD Redux: Choose Reliability Goals for Modules

QDD 116 Reliability Engineering during Design, with Adam Bahret (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 115 QDD Redux: 5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

QDD 114 The Instant Glory of Projects

QDD 113 What to do about Virtual Meetings

QDD 112 QDD Redux: How to self-advocate for more customer face time (and why it’s important)

QDD 111 Engineering with Receptivity, with Sol Rosenbaum (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 110 Don’t Wish for Cross-Functional Buy-in on Product Designs – Plan to Get It!

QDD 109 Before You Start Engineering Solutions, Do This

QDD 108 QDD Redux Ep. 4: Statistical vs. Practical Significance

QDD 107 QDD Redux Ep. 3: When it’s Not Normal: How to Choose from a Library of Distributions

QDD 106 QDD Redux Ep. 2: How to Handle Competing Failure Modes

QDD 105 QDD Redux Ep. 1: How Many Do We Need to Test?

QDD 104 The Fundamental Thing to Know from Statistics for Design Engineering

QDD 103 What to do for Effective and Efficient Working Meetings

QDD 102 Get Design Inputs with Flowcharts

QDD 101 Quality Tools are Legos of Development (and Their 7 Uses)

QDD 100 Lessons Learned from Coffee Pod Stories

QDD 099 Crucial Conversations in Engineering, with Shere Tuckey (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 098 Challenges Getting Team Input in Concept Development

QDD 097 Brainstorming within Design Sprints

QDD 096 After the ‘Storm: Compare and Prioritize Ideas

QDD 095 After the ‘Storm: Pareto Voting and Screening Methods

QDD 094 After the ‘Storm: Group and Explore Ideas

QDD 093 Product Design with Brainstorming, with Emily Haidemenos (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 092 Ways to Gather Ideas with a Team

QDD 091 The Spirits of Technical Writing Past, Present, and Future

QDD 090 The Gifts Others Bring

QDD 089 Next Steps after Surprising Test Results

QDD 088 Choose Reliability Goals for Modules

QDD 087 Start a System Architecture Diagram Early

QDD 086 Why Yield Quality in the Front-End of Product Development

QDD 085 Book Cast

QDD 084 Engineering in the Color Economy

QDD 083 Getting to Great Designs

QDD 082 Get Clarity on Goals with a Continuum

QDD 081 Variable Relationships: Correlation and Causation

QDD 080 Use Meetings to Add Productivity

QDD 079 Ways to Partner with Test Engineers

QDD 078 What do We do with FMEA Early in Design Concept?

QDD 077 A Severity Scale based on Quality Dimensions

QDD 076 Use Force Field Analysis to Understand Nuances

QDD 075 Getting Use Information without a Prototype

QDD 074 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Supplements Test

QDD 073 2 Lessons about Remote Work for Design Engineers

QDD 072 Always Plot the Data

QDD 071 Supplier Control Plans and Design Specs

QDD 070 Use FMEA to Design for In-Process Testing

QDD 069 Use FMEA to Choose Critical Design Features

QDD 068 Get Unstuck: Expand and Contract Our Problem

QDD 067 Get Unstuck: Reframe our Problem

QDD 066 5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

QDD 065 Prioritizing Technical Requirements with a House of Quality

QDD 064 Gemba for Product Design Engineering

QDD 063 Product Design from a Data Professional Viewpoint, with Gabor Szabo (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 062 How Does Reliability Engineering Affect (Not Just Assess) Design?

QDD 061 How to use FMEA for Complaint Investigation

QDD 060 3 Tips for Planning Design Reviews

QDD 059 Product Design from a Marketing Viewpoint, with Laura Krick (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 058 UFMEA vs. DFMEA

QDD 057 Design Input & Specs vs. Test & Measure Capability

QDD 056 ALT vs. HALT

QDD 055 Quality as a Strategic Asset vs. Quality as a Control

QDD 054 Design Specs vs. Process Control, Capability, and SPC

QDD 053 Internal Customers vs. External Customers

QDD 052 Discrete Data vs. Continuous Data

QDD 051 Prevention Controls vs. Detection Controls

QDD 050 Try this Method to Help with Complex Decisions (DMRCS)

QDD 049 Overlapping Ideas: Quality, Reliability, and Safety

QDD 048 Using SIPOC to Get Started

QDD 047 Risk Barriers as Swiss Cheese?

QDD 046 Environmental Stress Testing for Robust Designs

QDD 045 Choosing a Confidence Level for Test using FMEA

QDD 044 Getting Started with FMEA – It All Begins with a Plan

QDD 043 How can 8D help Solve my Recurring Problem?

QDD 042 Mistake-Proofing – The Poka-Yoke of Usability

QDD 041 Getting Comfortable with using Reliability Results

QDD 040 How to Self-Advocate for More Customer Face Time (and why it’s important)

QDD 039 Choosing Quality Tools (Mind Map vs. Flowchart vs. Spaghetti Diagram)

QDD 038 The DFE Part of DFX (Design For Environment and eXcellence)

QDD 037 Results-Driven Decisions, Faster: Accelerated Stress Testing as a Reliability Life Test

QDD 036 When to use DOE (Design of Experiments)?

QDD 035 Design for User Tasks using an Urgent/Important Matrix

QDD 034 Statistical vs. Practical Significance

QDD 033 How Many Do We Need To Test?

QDD 032 Life Cycle Costing for Product Design Choices

QDD 031 5 Aspects of Good Reliability Goals and Requirements

QDD 030 Using Failure Rate Functions to Drive Early Design Decisions

QDD 029 Types of Design Analyses possible with User Process Flowcharts

QDD 028 Design Tolerances Based on Economics (Using the Taguchi Loss Function)

QDD 027 How Many Controls do we Need to Reduce Risk?

QDD 026 Solving Symptoms Instead of Causes?

QDD 025 Do you have SMART ACORN objectives?

QDD 024 Why Look to Standards

QDD 023 Getting the Voice of the Customer

QDD 022 The Way We Test Matters

QDD 021 Designing Specs for QA

QDD 020 Every Failure is a Gift

QDD 019 Understanding the Purposes behind Kaizen

QDD 018 Fishbone Diagram: A Supertool to Understand Problems, Potential Solutions, and Goals

QDD 017 What is ‘Production Equivalent’ and Why Does it Matter?

QDD 016 About Visual Quality Standards

QDD 015 Using the Pareto Principle and Avoiding Common Pitfalls

QDD 014 The Who’s Who of your Quality Team

QDD 013 When it’s Not Normal: How to Choose from a Library of Distributions

QDD 012 What are TQM, QFD, Six Sigma, and Lean?

QDD 011 The Designer’s Important Influence on Monitoring After Launch

QDD 010 How to Handle Competing Failure Modes

QDD 009 About Using Slide Decks for Technical Design Reviews

QDD 008 Remaking Risk-Based Decisions: Allowing Ourselves to Change our Minds.

QDD 007 Need to innovate? Stop brainstorming and try a systematic approach.

QDD 006 HALT! Watch out for that weakest link

QDD 005 The Designer’s Risk Analysis affects Business, Projects, and Suppliers

QDD 004 A big failure and too many causes? Try this analysis.

QDD 003 Why Your Design Inputs Need to Include Quality & Reliability

QDD 002 My product works. Why don’t they want it?

QDD 001 How to Choose the Right Improvement Model

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy