Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Podcast Episodes » Quality during Design » QDD 087 Start a System Architecture Diagram Early

by Dianna Deeney Leave a Comment

QDD 087 Start a System Architecture Diagram Early

Start a System Architecture Diagram Early

New product development projects are really exciting at the start.

Even though we know very little about what the final product is going to look like, we can still use a quick graphical tool to help us direct our engineering attention.

We talk about ways to use a very simple System Architecture Diagram to help us get started and ways we can continue to iterate on it throughout development to help us communicate and make decisions.

 

View the Episode Transcript

We can use a System Architecture Diagram to help us investigate what is new, different, or has been a problem in the past – things that we may want to start looking into at the start.

We can keep it and continue to develop the diagram throughout the product design development.

  • Quality engineers can use it to see natural break points for quality assurance.
  • Reliability engineers can use it to start a Reliability Block Diagram, which can help the team decide on early reliability tests and reliability goals.
  • Manufacturing can start to use it to assess their current capabilities and needs.
  • FMEAs – we don’t want to do them on everything. Where do we need to do more analysis with FMEA to ensure the risks are controlled? And, at what levels? Subsystem and several components?

Overall, it can help identify what the team should be focused on to control the risks, deliver the right requirements, and create a design that is safe, dependable, and easy to use.

Citations:

Other Quality during Design podcast episodes you might like:

5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

What do we do with FMEA early in design concept?

 

Episode Transcript

We are starting on a new product development project. It’s an exciting time, so what do we work on? First, let’s talk about ways that we can look at the big picture of our concept development to figure out what we should focus most of our effort on in the beginning. Hello and welcome to Quality During Design, the place to use quality thinking to create products, others love for less. Each week we talk about ways to use quality during design, engineering, and product development. My name is Dianna Deeney. I’m a senior level quality professional and engineer with over 20 years of experience in manufacturing and design. Listen in and then join us. Visit quality during design.com.

Do you know what 12 things you should have before a design concept makes it to the engineering drawing board where you’re setting specifications. I’ve got a free checklist for you and you can do some assessments of your own. Where do you stack up with the checklist? You can log into a learning portal to access the checklist and an introduction to more information about how to get those 12 things. To get this free information, just sign up@qualityduringdesign.com. On the homepage, there’s a link in the middle of the page. Just click it and say, I want it.

New product development projects are really exciting, especially at the start. There’s a lot of things that engineers get excited about and that we like to do and figure out, and it’s just the whole project is sitting out before us. We feel like we can just kind of pick what it is, who we want to do or that we’re most excited about. I would encourage us to rein it in a little bit and take a moment with our team to figure out just a high level concept because we wanna be smart with our time and smart with how we develop this new product. Where are we going to apply our resources, which is our time and our energy and our efforts to get the biggest design impact that we can? Something that we can do is create a system architecture diagram. If you search that up on the internet, you’ll see a lot of really complicated diagrams with arrows and lots of boxes, and I’m not even talking about getting that crazy about it.

There is something to say about getting something out of our heads and onto paper or into a model where other people can interact with it. They can better understand what we are thinking. We can better understand what they’re thinking and we can start to develop ideas together. Now, this system architecture diagram, as we mentioned, it doesn’t have have to be complicated. It does work really well if it’s tangible. Now, we could use 3D items blocks to represent these if we really want to. It could be pieces of paper or post-it notes drawings on a whiteboard, and it can be a virtual whiteboard or a virtual posted note setting. Still getting it out of our heads and letting other people see it add to. It helps the whole team to be on the same page with what they are looking at and when they’re examining this concept idea.

For this system architecture diagram, we’re really just pulling out high level concepts of functions or of different subsystems that we know we’re going to have to assemble in order to make this concept a reality. For example, if we know we’re going to be designing a new type of power saw or a homeowner, we know that we’ll at least need a power source, something that’s going to be the cutting surface, some way for the user to interact or hold it, and a way for it to translate the power into a cutting motion. Those are four subsystems that we could conceive of our new product development, and we haven’t even talked to customers or really fully develop the concept yet, but that is good enough for us to start assessing where we should be applying our energies because we’re going to take it to the next step and start thinking about what is new, what is different, and what has been a problem in the past.

If we’re talking about the product itself, are we working with new materials? Is there a different requirement or a different kind of power source that we’re going to be looking into? Do we have a similar product in the market now that we notice we’ve had a problem with? We get a lot of complaints that trace back to the root cause being the switch that we decided to use for that other design. Those are the things that we may wanna spend more effort and time on to better understand as we’re developing this product. The new different or has been a problem isn’t just limited to our product itself. It can also be within our team and within our brain trust. We may have an excellent track record with electro mechanical devices, but what about the blades that cut different materials? We may not have a lot of experience with that.

That may be an area that we identify as having a project risk and some place where we want to redirect some of our efforts to make sure that we design it right. Another benefit of creating the system architecture diagram early besides helping us direct our efforts for concept development is we can iterate on it throughout the product development process. As we make decisions and as we learn about things, we can add details to it and eventually it might look like one of those diagrams that we search up on the internet that are very detailed and look confusing, but because we’ve been developing it all along, it’s going to help our team communicate with each other and with other departments. One of those departments that could possibly use this is the reliability engineering department. They do reliability block diagrams and they assess different reliability of subsystems.

Using these diagrams, they can help assess where you wanna have the most reliability and what that could mean for early testing. We can use this system architecture diagram and the information that we develop from it to also assess what FMEAs (failure mode effects analysis) we may want to do. We don’t need to do FMEA on everything. There may be a few highly critical subsystems or components that we really do want to analyze further with an FMEA to help us make design choices and control risks. Those are just a couple of ways that we could use a system architecture diagram in early concept development. What’s today’s insight to action at the beginning of a new product development project? It’s exciting and there are a lot of inputs that are vying for attention on what to work on. First, we can use a system architecture diagram to get our heads around what might be the most important or what carries the most risk of getting the design done and done well. Then we can continue to iterate on it for other things throughout product development.

If you like this topic or the content in this episode, there’s much more on our website including information about how to join our signature coaching program. The quality during design journey consistency is important, so subscribe to the weekly newsletter. This has been a production of Deeney Enterprises. Thanks for listening.

 

Filed Under: Quality during Design

About Dianna Deeney

Dianna is a senior-level Quality Professional and an experienced engineer. She has worked over 20 years in product manufacturing and design and is active in learning about the latest techniques in business.

Dianna promotes strategic use of quality tools and techniques throughout the design process.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quality during Design podcast logo

Tips for using quality tools and methods to help you design products others love, for less.


by Dianna Deeney
Quality during Design,
Hosted on Buzzsprout.com
Subscribe and enjoy every episode
Google
Apple
Spotify

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.