Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Dianna Deeney Leave a Comment

QDD 114 The Instant Glory of Projects

The Instant Glory of Projects

We do projects all the time. Some projects are about developing new things, and others are about improving what we have – continuous improvement.

In the quality realm, there’s what they call the instant glory model. This same kind of thing can happen in product design, too.

We talk about what quality folks call an instant glory, and what to do about it in product design engineering.

 

View the Episode Transcript


There’s a lot for a product design engineer to design into a product.

That’s why you shouldn’t try to do it alone. It takes a team of people to make a product design happen. And getting their input into the product design will help achieve what we set out to do, which is release a new product to market.

With their input, we’re also better set-up to achieve longer-term success within the market.


Other Quality during Design podcast episodes you might like:

Getting to Great Designs

Why Yield Quality in the Front-End of Product Development


Episode Transcript

We may get our product design released on time and on budget, which means success, but then that success doesn’t translate long term to the success of the product as part of our company’s portfolio. This happens to loss of projects, not just design projects. Let’s talk about these situations and what we might do to prevent them in product design after this brief introduction.

Hello and welcome to Quality during Design, the place to use quality thinking to create products others love, for less. Each week we talk about ways to use Quality during Design engineering and product development. I’m Dianna Deeney. I’m a senior level quality professional and engineer with over 20 years of experience in manufacturing and design. Listen in and then join us: visit qualityduringdesign.com.

We do projects all the time. I do projects all the time. Some projects are about developing new things and others are about improving what we have under the umbrella of continuous improvement.

In the quality realm, there is what they call the instant glory model. We have a challenge. We rise up to meet the challenge and to find a solution or make something better. And we implement a change and then of course we follow up, we measure the performance. Did the change really have an effect is what we wanted to have happen and how effective was it? We’re getting great results. So we’ve achieved success, right? But then, as time goes on, the success wanes and deteriorates. It’s not sustainable. When it’s passed off to the people to adopt and maintain this change, the people that are doing the work to keep the change going, so to say, they can’t do it. Not at the level of success that the continuous improvement team had.

Quality professionals call this short-lived continuous improvement as a “look-alike”. It looks like the team achieved success, but then it didn’t, not when it mattered, which is in the long term. They describe it as a collapse because the work done to achieve success and reaching the top of the mountain eventually collapses, and we’re sort of left back at the beginning or maybe worse off than when we started.

This same kind of thing can happen in product design too. There is a challenge. We have a new user need a new product opportunity. We’re going to meet that challenge by designing a product to fit that need, and then we achieve success with it. We usually look at the product release to market as achieving success of our new product venture. Then the product is monitored in the field. There’s some performance measurement. It gets initial great results. And yeah! We have a win! But as time goes on, success wanes and deteriorates.

This is going to be something normal for some products.

Sometimes novel ideas make a big splash and then become normal things that are expected. Like cell phones having a touch screen. It used to be novel and new, but now we expect them to have it.
There can also be technology changes in the marketplace that make older designs obsolete. Some products in the market don’t get to live out their full life cycle.
Those are just a couple of cases where this is normal for products to maybe not achieve long term success.

There are other cases where it isn’t that kind of a thing. This can happen when long term use of our product is impeded by how it’s designed.

It can’t be repaired. It can’t be upgraded to newer functionalities or enhancements. And those would have been good selling points for our product design.
We can have problems when risks aren’t mitigated or controlled. There’s things happening in the field that are not beyond unreasonable to have have happened, things we maybe should have considered and designed for: mitigated or controlled the risks from happening.
Another potential problem is that quality can’t be maintained long term. The initial supplier setup that we had was good, but then processes drifted or the right things weren’t being monitored like the critical features or aspect of the product design – things that are related to the design doing well, performing well, aren’t being measured and now product quality is not as good as it was when we started.
Or finally it could be that it just doesn’t last. It’s being used in a way or exposed to conditions that we didn’t test for.
That’s a lot for a product design engineer to design into a product. That’s why you shouldn’t try to do it alone.

It takes a team of people to make a product design happen and getting their input into the product design – its users and their goals and other limiting inputs, and then its features, its layouts, its modularity – that will help product design engineers. We’ll achieve what we set out to do. We’ll meet our challenge, which is to release a new product to market that fills an opportunity and meets a user need.

With our team’s input, we’re also better set up to achieve that longer term success after the release to market. Because other people are the ones who are going to take this design and maintain it in the market and make it a success.

They’re going to be marketing and selling the product, making sure people are aware of how awesome it is and helping them make a decision of whether or not to buy it.
They’ll be offering upgrades and performing customer service visits.
Investigating failures that do occur and helping to ensure it remains safe for customers to use.
They’ll also be producing it consistently with a level of quality.
And ensuring that users can use it in the way that they need to.
That’s their job: to help make the product a success in the market. There are a lot of things about the product design itself that are going to affect how they do their job. So we give them opportunities to affect the design itself.

As product design engineers, we know how to design against design inputs. We just need to get them out of our cross functional team’s heads and into ours. What we really need is alignment.

Reading reports is a good starting place. For example, marketing reports, needs analysis and those kinds of reports. And we should read them to start to form ideas and, more importantly, start forming questions.

Reading reports is no replacement for actually talking with the group to get alignment. It’s easier to read a report, yes, and it’s more comfortable to sit on our own and read a report and try to pick out design inputs that we need from it. But we really do need to talk and ask questions to really get alignment with the group that’s going to make this design a success.

Based on studies by Robert Cooper, not enough product development teams do enough of the sharp fact based concept development. Something that helps is having a structured conversation that helps product design engineers ask questions of their cross functional team and get the design inputs that we need. We can use quality tools for that.

So what is today’s insight? We want to talk with and have working meetings with our cross functional team to get alignment about a product design, Getting their input is going to help us avoid the instant glory of a new product launch that isn’t successful long term.

If you want to learn more about Quality during Design, please subscribe to the newsletter. You can subscribe on our website at qualityduringdesign com. This has been a production of Deeney Enterprises. Thanks for listening!

Filed Under: Quality during Design

About Dianna Deeney

Dianna is a senior-level Quality Professional and an experienced engineer. She has worked over 20 years in product manufacturing and design and is active in learning about the latest techniques in business.

Dianna promotes strategic use of quality tools and techniques throughout the design process.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quality during Design podcast logo

Tips for using quality tools and methods to help you design products others love, for less.


by Dianna Deeney
Quality during Design,
Hosted on Buzzsprout.com
Subscribe and enjoy every episode
Google
Apple
Spotify

Recent Episodes

QDD 128 Leveraging Proven Frameworks or Concept Development

QDD 127 Understanding Cross-Functional Collaboration

QDD 126 Exploring the Problem Space: A Key Principle for Robust Product Design and Project Success

QDD 125 Exploring Product Development and AI Through Literature

QDD 124 Design for User Tasks using an Urgent/Important Matrix

QDD 123 Information Development in Design, with Scott Abel – Part 2 (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 122 Information Development in Design, with Scott Abel – Part 1 (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 121 Crafting Effective Technical Documents for the Engineering Field

QDD 120 How to use FMEA for Complaint Investigation

QDD 119 Results-Driven Decisions, Faster: Accelerated Stress Testing as a Reliability Life Test

QDD 118 Journey from Production to Consumption: Enhancing Product Reliability

QDD 117 QDD Redux: Choose Reliability Goals for Modules

QDD 116 Reliability Engineering during Design, with Adam Bahret (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 115 QDD Redux: 5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

QDD 114 The Instant Glory of Projects

QDD 113 What to do about Virtual Meetings

QDD 112 QDD Redux: How to self-advocate for more customer face time (and why it’s important)

QDD 111 Engineering with Receptivity, with Sol Rosenbaum (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 110 Don’t Wish for Cross-Functional Buy-in on Product Designs – Plan to Get It!

QDD 109 Before You Start Engineering Solutions, Do This

QDD 108 QDD Redux Ep. 4: Statistical vs. Practical Significance

QDD 107 QDD Redux Ep. 3: When it’s Not Normal: How to Choose from a Library of Distributions

QDD 106 QDD Redux Ep. 2: How to Handle Competing Failure Modes

QDD 105 QDD Redux Ep. 1: How Many Do We Need to Test?

QDD 104 The Fundamental Thing to Know from Statistics for Design Engineering

QDD 103 What to do for Effective and Efficient Working Meetings

QDD 102 Get Design Inputs with Flowcharts

QDD 101 Quality Tools are Legos of Development (and Their 7 Uses)

QDD 100 Lessons Learned from Coffee Pod Stories

QDD 099 Crucial Conversations in Engineering, with Shere Tuckey (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

QDD 098 Challenges Getting Team Input in Concept Development

QDD 097 Brainstorming within Design Sprints

QDD 096 After the ‘Storm: Compare and Prioritize Ideas

QDD 095 After the ‘Storm: Pareto Voting and Screening Methods

QDD 094 After the ‘Storm: Group and Explore Ideas

QDD 093 Product Design with Brainstorming, with Emily Haidemenos (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 092 Ways to Gather Ideas with a Team

QDD 091 The Spirits of Technical Writing Past, Present, and Future

QDD 090 The Gifts Others Bring

QDD 089 Next Steps after Surprising Test Results

QDD 088 Choose Reliability Goals for Modules

QDD 087 Start a System Architecture Diagram Early

QDD 086 Why Yield Quality in the Front-End of Product Development

QDD 085 Book Cast

QDD 084 Engineering in the Color Economy

QDD 083 Getting to Great Designs

QDD 082 Get Clarity on Goals with a Continuum

QDD 081 Variable Relationships: Correlation and Causation

QDD 080 Use Meetings to Add Productivity

QDD 079 Ways to Partner with Test Engineers

QDD 078 What do We do with FMEA Early in Design Concept?

QDD 077 A Severity Scale based on Quality Dimensions

QDD 076 Use Force Field Analysis to Understand Nuances

QDD 075 Getting Use Information without a Prototype

QDD 074 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Supplements Test

QDD 073 2 Lessons about Remote Work for Design Engineers

QDD 072 Always Plot the Data

QDD 071 Supplier Control Plans and Design Specs

QDD 070 Use FMEA to Design for In-Process Testing

QDD 069 Use FMEA to Choose Critical Design Features

QDD 068 Get Unstuck: Expand and Contract Our Problem

QDD 067 Get Unstuck: Reframe our Problem

QDD 066 5 Options to Manage Risks during Product Engineering

QDD 065 Prioritizing Technical Requirements with a House of Quality

QDD 064 Gemba for Product Design Engineering

QDD 063 Product Design from a Data Professional Viewpoint, with Gabor Szabo (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 062 How Does Reliability Engineering Affect (Not Just Assess) Design?

QDD 061 How to use FMEA for Complaint Investigation

QDD 060 3 Tips for Planning Design Reviews

QDD 059 Product Design from a Marketing Viewpoint, with Laura Krick (A Chat with Cross Functional Experts)

QDD 058 UFMEA vs. DFMEA

QDD 057 Design Input & Specs vs. Test & Measure Capability

QDD 056 ALT vs. HALT

QDD 055 Quality as a Strategic Asset vs. Quality as a Control

QDD 054 Design Specs vs. Process Control, Capability, and SPC

QDD 053 Internal Customers vs. External Customers

QDD 052 Discrete Data vs. Continuous Data

QDD 051 Prevention Controls vs. Detection Controls

QDD 050 Try this Method to Help with Complex Decisions (DMRCS)

QDD 049 Overlapping Ideas: Quality, Reliability, and Safety

QDD 048 Using SIPOC to Get Started

QDD 047 Risk Barriers as Swiss Cheese?

QDD 046 Environmental Stress Testing for Robust Designs

QDD 045 Choosing a Confidence Level for Test using FMEA

QDD 044 Getting Started with FMEA – It All Begins with a Plan

QDD 043 How can 8D help Solve my Recurring Problem?

QDD 042 Mistake-Proofing – The Poka-Yoke of Usability

QDD 041 Getting Comfortable with using Reliability Results

QDD 040 How to Self-Advocate for More Customer Face Time (and why it’s important)

QDD 039 Choosing Quality Tools (Mind Map vs. Flowchart vs. Spaghetti Diagram)

QDD 038 The DFE Part of DFX (Design For Environment and eXcellence)

QDD 037 Results-Driven Decisions, Faster: Accelerated Stress Testing as a Reliability Life Test

QDD 036 When to use DOE (Design of Experiments)?

QDD 035 Design for User Tasks using an Urgent/Important Matrix

QDD 034 Statistical vs. Practical Significance

QDD 033 How Many Do We Need To Test?

QDD 032 Life Cycle Costing for Product Design Choices

QDD 031 5 Aspects of Good Reliability Goals and Requirements

QDD 030 Using Failure Rate Functions to Drive Early Design Decisions

QDD 029 Types of Design Analyses possible with User Process Flowcharts

QDD 028 Design Tolerances Based on Economics (Using the Taguchi Loss Function)

QDD 027 How Many Controls do we Need to Reduce Risk?

QDD 026 Solving Symptoms Instead of Causes?

QDD 025 Do you have SMART ACORN objectives?

QDD 024 Why Look to Standards

QDD 023 Getting the Voice of the Customer

QDD 022 The Way We Test Matters

QDD 021 Designing Specs for QA

QDD 020 Every Failure is a Gift

QDD 019 Understanding the Purposes behind Kaizen

QDD 018 Fishbone Diagram: A Supertool to Understand Problems, Potential Solutions, and Goals

QDD 017 What is ‘Production Equivalent’ and Why Does it Matter?

QDD 016 About Visual Quality Standards

QDD 015 Using the Pareto Principle and Avoiding Common Pitfalls

QDD 014 The Who’s Who of your Quality Team

QDD 013 When it’s Not Normal: How to Choose from a Library of Distributions

QDD 012 What are TQM, QFD, Six Sigma, and Lean?

QDD 011 The Designer’s Important Influence on Monitoring After Launch

QDD 010 How to Handle Competing Failure Modes

QDD 009 About Using Slide Decks for Technical Design Reviews

QDD 008 Remaking Risk-Based Decisions: Allowing Ourselves to Change our Minds.

QDD 007 Need to innovate? Stop brainstorming and try a systematic approach.

QDD 006 HALT! Watch out for that weakest link

QDD 005 The Designer’s Risk Analysis affects Business, Projects, and Suppliers

QDD 004 A big failure and too many causes? Try this analysis.

QDD 003 Why Your Design Inputs Need to Include Quality & Reliability

QDD 002 My product works. Why don’t they want it?

QDD 001 How to Choose the Right Improvement Model

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy